ACTUALLY NO I AM NOT A FLATTERER
I ONLY SAY WHAT NEEDS TO BE SAID WHEN I FEEL IT IS NECESSARY
AND I THINK THAT IS VERY CONSIDERATE OF YOU ROSE
YOU ARE ONLY DOING THIRD PARTIES A FAVORTHATS GREAT TO HEAR
YOU ARE ALSO PROVIDING ME WITH AN IDEA FOR A CLASS ID LIKE TO TAKE IN THE FUTURE
WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE OF THE TWO?
JUST CURIOUSI WAS ACTUALLY TRYING TO BE HUMBLE
BUT I FEEL IT IS OKAY TO BRAG NOW THAT YOUVE GIVEN ME PERMISSION >:]
THE OVERLAP BETWEEN THE TWO IS OFF THE CHARTS
IF YOU DO NOT HAVE THE SKILLS AND INTELLIGENCE TO CRACK OPEN A HUMAN BEING USING YOUR OWN INSTINCTUAL CAPABILITIES THEN YOU ARE WORTHLESS IN THE COURTROOM
Well, it’s only common courtesy. Imagine if I were to begin speaking to you in Russian, with nary a hint at what my intentions are. You could only assume that I was doing it to confuse you, or that I was confusing you with someone else.
Well, I generally prefer the slightly more abstract and slightly more applicable tenets of the broader category of neuroscience, especially since I worked with one of the professors in the department to create a program that creates a refreshable tactile MRI display, using a series of electromechanical pins, similar to a refreshable Braille display, to show the areas of brain activity.
You’re quite correct, Ms. Pyrope. Legal studies can be quite the exercise in human psychology. I haven’t discounted the possibility of forensic psychology as a potential career, though I think I’d prefer something with a little more emphasis on the biology and chemistry of the brain as opposed to a more esoteric study of the mind.